Hello, Lichess!
I have a question/slight complaint. I just finished this game, or rather it got finished, without opponent resigning. Seems he violated the rules in some way. I got awarded the win, but not the points. Here is the game.
I even got a much better position in the end, and he literally got banned mid-game.
It just seems wrong to me not to award points if it counts as a win, although "by banned opponent" so to speak. If he got banned a couple minutes later, I would get those points. Is there some reason this is necessary?
I would suggest an idea-don't ban people while they are in the middle of a game, let it play out, and if the cheater wins, give back points to the loser, (I know that already happens anyway) but this is punishing the person who is not cheating also. Let the game finish!
Although, I'm very surprised to get such a position against a cheater, maybe he got banned for some other reason, in which case it is even worse to not get points.
I have a question/slight complaint. I just finished this game, or rather it got finished, without opponent resigning. Seems he violated the rules in some way. I got awarded the win, but not the points. Here is the game.
I even got a much better position in the end, and he literally got banned mid-game.
It just seems wrong to me not to award points if it counts as a win, although "by banned opponent" so to speak. If he got banned a couple minutes later, I would get those points. Is there some reason this is necessary?
I would suggest an idea-don't ban people while they are in the middle of a game, let it play out, and if the cheater wins, give back points to the loser, (I know that already happens anyway) but this is punishing the person who is not cheating also. Let the game finish!
Although, I'm very surprised to get such a position against a cheater, maybe he got banned for some other reason, in which case it is even worse to not get points.