No está mal nada mal pero te sugiero de mi parte que pongas ejemplos de cada pregunta,
por ejemplo pone imagenes de lo que estas hablando,
digo yo.
por ejemplo pone imagenes de lo que estas hablando,
digo yo.
It's quite accurate and got half way between my standard and rapid ratings but I disagree with question 4.
Take games 7, 9 and 12 from last years World Championships between Carlsen-Caruana as the proof...
Take games 7, 9 and 12 from last years World Championships between Carlsen-Caruana as the proof...
pero no esta mal
The test is flawed because you're most likely going to say yes to all the questions if you know basic chess but I guess I'm a GM!
@Ducati09 Fair point. I wouldn't say its flawed as much as it requires true reflection. To obtain a rating that you feel is accurate, you have to be incredibly critical of your own flaws.
@Croughoubhr Fair enough. I feel like the top players are well above this test though :P
@Croughoubhr Fair enough. I feel like the top players are well above this test though :P
@TitleKiller True, but your rating goes up to 3000 and as far as I know nobody has ever reached that so far. So in theory this also includes them ;P
@Croughoubhr Fair point! I guess question 4 needs revision!
@TitleKiller Just add "excepting match strategy in pairings with more than one game"
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.